FROM HEAVEN TO EARTH


I WROTE ON 23RD SEPTEMBER 2010:

THE GREAT PROSTITUTE
(REVELATION CH. 17,1 ? 18)

WE HAVE WRITTEN AND SPREAD (SEE ATTACHMENTS).

THE DUNG OF SATAN, THIS WAS SAINT FRANCIS? DEFINITION OF MONEY, IS THE PROPRIETOR OF THE VATICAN THROUGH THE IOR. AND IF THE DUNG OF SATAN IS ALSO STAINED OF ILLEGALITY OR EVEN BLOOD, FROM BEING A PROSTITUTE, THE BANK OF ROME TURNS ITSELF INTO THE ANTICHRISTIC HYDRA OF BIBLICAL MEMORY. BUT THE CAUSE OF THIS EVIL IS WORSE THAN THE EVIL ITSELF.
THE VERTICES OF THE VATICAN, WITH THE POPE HOSTAGE OF THEIR POWER, ARE THE COORDINATORS AND THE ORGANIZERS OF THE CRIMES AND HORRORS MADE BY THE BANK OF THE VATICAN. THE CARDINALS AND ESPECIALLY CARDINAL BERTONE MUST RESPOND TO JESUS CHRIST, WHO SOON WILL REVISIT THE WORLD WITH POWER AND GREAT GLORY. HIGH TREASON OF HIM AND OF BILLIONS OF FAITHFUL SOULS WILL BE THE CHARGE BROUGHT BY THE SUPREME JUDGE, SON OF GOD AND FOUNDER OF THE APOSTOLIC CATHOLIC CHURCH.
REGARDING THE SOULS WHO BELIEVE... WHAT ARE THE CATHOLIC CHRISTIANS WAITING FOR TO LEAVE THE VATICAN? TO LEAVE EMPTY PETER?S PENCE AND ACCUSE, AS CHRIST DID, THE MERCHANTS OF THE TEMPLE, DIRTY THIEVES?
SORRY! BUT WE HAVE THE COURAGE TO SPEAK UP AND SHOUT THE TRUTH!

GIORGIO BONGIOVANNI

BEHIND THE IOR, NOTHING?
President Gotti Tedeschi and the general manager Cipriani
defendants for violating the anti - money laundering normatives.
By Anna Petrozzi

President of the IOR, Ettore Gotti Tedeschi, assured full transparency and full cooperation with the judges, when last June and in November 2009 an investigation, by the Prosecutor of Rome, placed under the magnifying glass a few million dollar operations (in euros) that occurred between the Vatican bank and other banks including UniCredit, Intesa San Paolo and Banca del Fucino.
Now the transparency will not be sufficient, the famous economist, will have to provide precise and detailed replies to the public prosecutors Nello Rossi and Stefano Rocco Fava, who put him under investigation along with the general manager Paolo Cipriani for violating the law against money laundering.
Since 2003, the Supreme Court has in fact established the competence of the Italian jurisdiction also for the IOR and the Bankitalia itself, with a circular dated September 9th, has imposed tighter controls on the Vatican bank since it is considered a Credit Istitution of the European Community.
In particular, the dispute against the two leaders regards paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 55 of the Decree Law 231 of 2007, which means they are accused of failing to provide the information required regarding the identity of the persons on behalf of which they executed operations (paragraph 2) and the purpose and nature of the continuative relationship or the professional services (paragraph 3).
There is no evidence of money laundering thus, in fact it is very difficult to find. But the failure to report is found to be equally serious to the point that the two prosecutors obtained by the investigating magistrate Maria Teresa Covatta, the seizing of 23 million euros (on a total of 28) deposited on a bank account opened at the Rome headquarters of the Credito Artigiano SpA.
According to the reconstruction, this operation should regard the transfer of 20 million to JP Morgan in Frankfurt and 3 to the Bank of Fucino. The transaction was reported as suspicious by the Financial Intelligence Unit of the Bank of Italy (UIF), which has therefore suspended the operation for 5 days, allowing the Guardia di Finanza to carry out the inspections.
The Holy See has not hesitated to express its solidarity and confidence to Gotti Tedeschi and Cipriani, and reaffirming its commitment to let the IOR be inserted into the so-called "white list", a sort of list of good institutes that make transparency a hallmark.
As for the transactions we are talking about ? it is reported in the statement issued in the Vatican press office - these are giro transactions (i.e. a transfer of money between accounts of the same owner) for treasury at non Italian banks, addressed to IOR itself. This would explain why there would be behind the various transfers only the initials of the bank. The prosecutors, on the contrary, speculate that behind the acronym IOR can hide individuals or companies who have used these shield accounts as a privileged way for the movement of the capital between Italy and abroad. The investigation aims to identify precisely the possible recipients of the bonds and transactions worth millions of euros.


VATICAN BANK, STORM ON ITS VERTICES, SUSPECTED CIPRIANI AND GOTTI TEDESCHI

Rome, seized 23 million. "Circumvented the anti-money laundering laws and risk of new crimes".
On the suspected account have been handled 116 million incoming and 117 outgoing.
CARLO BONINI
ROME - In a significant and possibly desired historical cabal, in a Monday, Sept. 20th that celebrates the 140 years of the breach of Porta Pia, for the first time in history it collapsed with crash the Republican bastion that since 1946 has been giving penal protection to the soft work of those who live in the tower of Nicholas V, seat of the Institute of Religious Works (IOR), the Vatican Bank. The investigating magistrate in Rome Maria Teresa Covatta, accepting the demands of the prosecutor Nello Rossi, and of the substitute Stefano Rocco Fava provided for the seizure of 23 million euros deposited on account 49557 opened by the IOR at the Rome branch of the " Credito Cooperativo artigiano" (Bank of Credit Valtellinese group), freezing two separate operations of transfer that were supposed to shift from the Vatican safe, 20 million to the investment bank ?JP Morgan? in Frankfurt on the current account with Iban DE81501108006231606168 and 3 million euros to the account with Iban IT75Q0312403210000020020498 at the Rome branch of ?Bank of Fucino?. Furthermore, with the seizure, the President of the institute, Ettore Gotti Tedeschi, and its general manager Paul Cipriani, are under investigation for the crime of "omitted observance" of the Anti-Money Laundering (it is the legislative decree 231 of 2007, which implemented a European Union directive). "It is proven - the investigating judge Covatta wrote in her seizure order - the omission act perpetrated by the Vatican that even if required, it avoided to communicate the general nature of the subjects for which it had asked the Credito Artigiano to carry out the transfers and it did not provide information on the purpose and nature of the transaction." An omission documented by an exchange of faxes between the IOR and the "Credito" and by the communications between the "Credito" and the 'Financial Intelligence Unit (UIF) of the Bank of Italy. According to reconstruction contained in a note of the Currency Police Unit of the Guardia di Finanza, last September 6th the IOR asked in fact the "Credito" to carry out the two transfer operations. The bank (which has received in January as all other banks a circular of the Bank of Italy, that forces "when dealings with the IOR," an extra- European institute, to respect "the obligations of enforced due diligence") asked the Vatican to provide information on the beneficiaries and the reason of the operations. But the answers did not come and thus, on 14th September, the "Credito" decided to report what happened to the UIF. On 15th September, the order of suspension of bank operations by Bank of Italy reached the "Credito" for a period of five working days and, simultaneously, the Currency Unit police and the Prosecutor's Office were activated. At that point - says the preliminary investigation judge - the seizure of 23 million become 'due', 'urgent'. 'To avoid ? she writes - that the free availability of the object of the crime could aggravate the consequences or facilitate the similar felonies. "In fact, the investigation of 23 million of the IOR, its beneficiaries, its nature, starts now. But not from scratch. The Financial Police has already established that only on account 49557 of the "Credito Coperativo" (which by the way it was curiously ?declared closed? on April 19th), the IOR has moved over time 116 million Euros outgoing and 117 incoming towards anonymous recipients (a similar discovery had covered an account at the branch 204 of the former Banca di Roma, where the money handled by the Vatican amounted to 180 million euros over 10 years). Moreover: for more than a year, the prosecutor's office - for the initiative of the prosecuting judges that required the seizure - has been considering with the Financial Police, hundreds of operations of triangulation conducted by the IOR through the major Italian banks, in breach of obligations under money laundering rules. In short, we are at the beginning. This explains the irritated 'surprise' of the ?Beyond Tiber?. Only to discover that in the year of grace 2010, the generous interpretation of Article 11 of the Lateran Pacts (law under the "non-interference" of the Italian State on Vatican affairs), the same that in 1987 avoided the prison to the President of the IOR Paul Marcinkus for the bankruptcy of the Ambrosiano, is outdated. Indeed, it has been overturned by the Court of Cassation (Sentence 22516 of 2003). A bad news for the Secretary of State. Also because in these days there are two thorns afflicting the Vatican. The first one is called IOR. The other one, "Propaganda Fide" and Crescenzio Sepe.

LA REPUBBLICA 22nd September , 2010

Link to Crimes and Paedophilia in the Vatican:
http://www.giorgiobongiovanni.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1331:crimini-e-pedofilia-in-vaticano&catid=93&Itemid=23